1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
g100num [7]
2 years ago
7

What is the penalty for sedition in the united states.

Law
2 answers:
lbvjy [14]2 years ago
8 0

The penalty for sedition in the United States is either:

  • Death
  • Five years' imprisonment
  • Fine of $10,000
  • Ban from holding public office.

<h3>What is sedition?</h3>

Sedition is a conspiracy to forcefully overthrow, put down, or destroy the government.

Sedition includes an act of rebellion, subversion, incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against constituted authority.

Thus, the penalty for sedition in the United States is either <u>death</u> or <u>five years imprisonment</u> plus a minimum <u>fine of $10,000</u> and a <u>ban</u> from holding public office.

Learn more about sedition at brainly.com/question/14100347

RideAnS [48]2 years ago
4 0
The penalty could include death or imprisonment for a minimum of five years.
You might be interested in
Alice is a marketing representative employed by a health plan. Betty is a captive agent of a health plan who markets to multiple
romanna [79]
insurance but go to court
And ask judges and ask FDA about insurance and will lead you to it
4 0
3 years ago
How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
DUE TODAY, PLEASE HELP. GHB Sdn Bhd, a construction company, wanted to buy a piece of land. The company promised to pay Sandhu a
Alex787 [66]

Answer:

GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu

The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.

1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.

2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer.  Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.

3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.

Explanation:

GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached.  One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB.  Was the deal closed because of the extra commission?  No.

6 0
3 years ago
DUE AT 11:59 PLZ HELP!
Ilya [14]

Answer:

Phineas

you user the app because I'm a tutor and it helps

5 0
2 years ago
Chinese Exclusion Act (1882)<br> how is this a form of discrimination?
-BARSIC- [3]
The Chinese exclusion act of 1882 allegedly stated that Chinese immigrants were no longer allowed in America. This was a form of discrimination because they were not welcomed even though they were a significant force of labor .
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • As an entrepreneur, you’ll face lots of tough and sometimes ethical decisions. In the situation described below, what do you thi
    14·1 answer
  • Responsible drivers assess their personal fitness to drive before getting behind the wheel. Discuss 3
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is one of the major arguments against term limits for state legislators?
    15·1 answer
  • How are judicial activism and judicial review related?
    10·2 answers
  • how much proof is necessary for a criminal trial? how is this different from the amount of proof necessary in a civil trial?​
    5·2 answers
  • Evidence that is in view of the police does not require a search warrant, but can be legally seized is called _______ ________ _
    7·1 answer
  • Why morality should be based on solely religion.​
    10·1 answer
  • Secondary sources of law: Group of answer choices are looked to when there is no primary source of law that applies to the facts
    10·1 answer
  • Help is appreciated!^ there is a photo attached
    12·2 answers
  • when firms from wealthy countries trade with firms from poor countries, they benefit from economic____.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!