When a senator employs the strategy of filibustering, that senator has the ability to block a vote on a measure. Option B. i.e "The Senator..."
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a filibuster?</h3>
Generally, A filibuster is a method that is used by a small number of senators in the United States Senator in order to oppose and stop the passage of legislation, despite the fact that the proposal has enough supporters to approve it.
Although the body has developed another piece of legislation to deal with difficulties of a similar kind, the filibuster continues to exist in the Senate chamber to this day.
This is done in order to prevent the law from being passed.
In conclusion, this action is taken in spite of the fact that there are sufficient advocates for the measure for it to be passed.
When using this tactic, one must take advantage of the rule that stipulates a sixty-vote threshold in order to put a stop to the deliberation on a certain issue.
Read more about filibuster
brainly.com/question/24047431
#SPJ1
Answer:c.No, because although the two may be correlated, causation has not been established.
Explanation: Correlation only show us that there exist a relationship between two variable but it doesn't actual say that one is the cause of the other. It doesn't give us the cause of why this is happening or it doesn't say that these agreements are the cause of partners staying long with each other , it only tells us that there seems to be a relationship of some sort that exist. They may be may underlying causes that drives this which are not related to just argument so since correlation doesn't mean causation one can not make a conclusion from just correlation alone.
Answer:
the most appropriate finding for this age is that the children has 28 permanent teeth.
Explanation:
First of all, we don't have much data to figure out something more than that the children should have 28 permanent Teeth. Because according to the information provided we can't figure out even the children's genre. So in our case, we must formulate an inference based on a generalization of species growth. That is our best-case scenario.
Answer:
Apartheid was the official policy of racial separation and ill treatment of blacks followed by the government of South Africa between 1948 and 1989.
2) Under this policy the blacks were forced to live in crowded townships lacking basic amenities. There were separate transport, hotels, beaches and even churches for the whites and blacks.
3) They had no political rights and no representation in the parliament.
4) The African national Congress started a movement against apartheid which gradually gained momentum. This included many worker’s unions and the Communist party.
5) International opposition against apartheid and economic sanctions imposed by the UNO had serious effect on South Africa.
6) The white regime realized that they could no longer keep the blacks under their rule and began to change their policies. Discriminatory laws were repealed. In 1990, President F.W. De Clerk released Nelson Mandela from jail after 28 years of imprisonment and began to negotiate with the ANC.
7) Finally at the midnight of 26 April 1994, a new democratic republic of South Africa was born. The apartheid government gave way to the formation of a multi-racial government.
Answer:
<em>The correct option is B) Pluralist models</em>
Explanation:
In the pluralism political theory, a group of individuals maximize their interest of various political aspects so that they can gain political support.
There is a single center of power in a pluralist model. Freedom of association comes under the pluralist model.
The pluralist model is one of the three types of models of democracy. The rest two being participatory and elite.
