The colonists criticized the Stamp Acts as "taxation without representation", because the colonists did not have consent over this form of taxation imposed on them. It was a decision made in the British Parliament without anyone representing the colonies when this decision was upheld.
<u>A. Popular sovereignty.</u>
This political doctrine holds that all political power that governs society (authorities of states and federal government) is inherent in the people, that is to say, people create it, gives consents to it and sustains it. The U.S. Constitution this concept by guaranteeing people's right to choose their representative (individuals that advocate for their needs, desires, and projects as a society ) through fair and democratic elections.
I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.
<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>
Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.
C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.
D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.
Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D
The correct option is D: CHIEF LEGISLATOR.
The president has many roles that he plays, one of them is the role of the chief legislator. The chief legislator is responsible for signing or vetoing new legislation. The president has the power to influence the congress in its duty of lawmaking.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
They wrote about the development of Stoicism during the Roman Empire.