<span>Sounds like a very ambigous question and deserves an ambiguos answer. Art doesn't have to be inovative in my opinion it just has to make you think or show you a image of a earlier time. Actually it sounds like a stupid question to be inovative is to be more effecient or for something to function a better way. That's great if your talking about toasters but has no place in the art world unless your talking about water colors. Walt Whitman was a poet I guess you could considr him a literal artist but he's known as a poet.</span>
A listener to Samjay who reads the excerpt might notice that C. In the text excerpt, readers understand how Samjay is feeling. In the audio excerpt, however, listeners only hear the narrator.
<h3>What difference would the listener to Samjay notice?</h3>
When listening to Samjay via the audio recording, the listener will only be aware of what Samjay tells them.
When the person reads the excerpt from the passage however, they would notice other things such as how Samjay is feeling.
Find out more on audio listening v. reading at brainly.com/question/24331519.
#SPJ1
Answer:
it means something that is bare like for example your "bare" hands
Explanation:
its a word with a meaning that i know. but i haven't read the poem.
