I don’t have a good thing to say but I’ll be there at least a week or two weeks so I’m not sure what if constituting
American managers who work alone have completed the majority of the work, followed by Chinese and Israeli managers who work with other members of their ingroup.
<h3>What do Americans think about their bilateral economic relations with China?</h3>
A majority of Americans and Canadians—nearly 50%—say that the current state of the two countries' economic ties is unsatisfactory because of considerable trade disputes and worries about China's political stability. In addition, attitudes about ties are negative in South Korea and Japan, with respective percentages of 66% and 51%.
<h3>China does have the world's largest economy:</h3>
Germany, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and France are the four countries where perceptions of China as the world's most important economy are at least ten percentage points higher than those of the United States.
<h3>How do Russians view China as the largest economy in the world?</h3>
For Russians, this is a 14-point rise in the proportion of people who chose China in 2018 and a continuation According to pluralities in the majority of the nations studied, China has a strong influence on their country's economic concerns.
Learn more about China's economy visit:
brainly.com/question/3406264
#SPJ4
Answer:
No. The Romans did not commit genocide against the Gauls
Explanation:
Julius Ceaser's Gallic Wars occurred from 58 to 51 B.C. Gaul was invaded by the Romans mainly for money. Ceaser needed to pay off his debts and also wanted to keep making a name for himself, thus invading Gaul was the answer. He didn't care about the people who lived there nor did he ever discuss their culture, nationality, or race as being a reason for invading. If we look at the definition of genocide it's "the deliberate or systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." Again, Ceaser never listed any of those as being a reason for invasion; all he needed was victories.
Answer:
I believe its choice a because it's the only one that makes sense according to process of elimination
Answer: When archaeologists are reconstructing the "Who, where, and when?" of the past, they are reconstructing <u>history(Social changes).</u>
Explanation:
The information generated will tell us about the way of life of past societies and the conclusions obtained provide <u>new data that will help the reconstruction of human history and culture.</u>
The only way we can <em>understand past societies</em> is through what they left behind, their material remains. The interrelation of these materials and the environmental contexts will give us the key to describe and u<u>nderstand an extinct society.</u>
