The answer is C - It is a waste to use gold for everyday purposes, because it is hard to find.
1. The Connotations of the word "worth" are a) financial value and b) assets.
- The speaker uses the abacus with her mother to analyze and summarize their financial worth. Before the advent of calculators, the abacus served as a tool for counting financial figures.
2. The speaker discusses something more than financial worth when she stated that their worth was being counted or evaluated with an abacus to show that one should always account for their possessions, whether the possessions are financial or not.
- Periodically, the speaker and her mother needed to determine their preparedness for the coming winter season. During the winter, they would not have the opportunity to venture outside their closed doors to get things for the sustenance of life.
- So taking account before the rain days is important in life, though it may sound tedious and mundane.
3. The speaker and her mother have to keep money "buried" in jars for safe-keeping. Accountants are known for using professional techniques to safeguard the assets of their entities.
4. There is always an emotional or psychological reason for hoarding coins at home. Keeping some cash within easy reach had always been more prudent than having every coin kept in the bank.
The experience of winter gloriously teaches that ready cash must be available at home and not always in the bank. This practice is gradually becoming outdated with the advent of online banking and bank cards.
5. The closing word "foundation" in <em>Accounting by Natasha Trethewey</em> shows that money is important in a home, just as the foundation is to a building.
- Money keeps the home together. Time spent together doing some "accounting" is the cement of the home. A building on a strong foundation stands the test of the weather.
Thus, the art of accounting has remained a long-time practice connected with the determination of financial worth and value.
Read more about Natasha Trethewey's poems at brainly.com/question/22202201
The predicate is the part of the sentence that tells what the subject is all about. A compound predicate consists of two main verbs along with its complements which describes the subject. In the given sentence above, the portion that contains a compound predicate is NONE. There is no compound predicate in the sentence, since the predicate is only "were a popular comedy team on radio, television, and stage." The correct answer would be option D.
Answer:
1st person. == I
second person == you
third person singular==He
third person plural ==they
2 and 4 are both strong. It is clear what is going to be discussed especially on 4. Two is very intreging. It would be nice to see how that will develop. By that it would be interesting to see how those two ideas will be tired together.
One is too vague. It's true, but where are you going with that? Some indication has to be given.
Three has the same problem. Bad? What does bad mean? I may be wrong, but I think a thesis statement, if at all possible, should use concrete nouns. There should be no doubt about where this is going.
This is just an example of what I mean
Throughout history, every time a new technology was developed, it was immediately used in war. I think both 2 and 4 do something like that.
Answer
1 weak
2 strong
3 weak
4 strong
