Morris is in favor of the Three-fifths Compromise because of the indispensible necessity of making the Executive independent of the Legislature body.
<h3>What was the
Three-fifths Compromise?</h3>
The Compromise determined that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning taxes and representation; it compromise granted a disproportionate political power to Southern slave states.
According to the excerpt from September 4, 1787, by Gouverneur Morris, he is favor of the Three-fifths Compromise because of the indispensible necessity of making the Executive independent of the Legislature body.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Three-fifths Compromise
brainly.com/question/2144004
#SPJ1
Answer:
Question 1: End of the Soviet Domination of Eastern Europe.
Question 2: With violence and physical repression.
Explanation:
<span>Most of the settlers who followed Stephen
Austin into Texas hoped that Texas would become a self-governing Mexican
state.</span>
Stephen Fuller
Austin<span> <span>(November 3, 1793 – December 27, 1836) was an American </span></span>empresario<span> <span>born in </span></span>Virginia<span> <span>and raised in southeastern </span></span>Missouri<span>. Known as the Father of </span>Texas<span>, and the founder of Texas, he led the second, and ultimately
successful, colonization of the region by bringing </span>300 families<span> <span>from the United States to the region in 1825. In addition, he worked with
the Mexican government to support </span></span>immigration from the United States.
The correct answer between all
the choices given is the third choice or letter C. I am hoping that this answer
has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and
if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
They realized that nothing really changed much. The freed African-Americans still had almost no political rights and the system was controlled mostly by corrupt politicians who came from the north to become rich. The regular people still had huge farms and turned the former slave system into a system of sharecropping which was in many ways similar to slavery. The freedom was very superficial and in reality people still lived as bad as before the war.
