The correct answer is letter D
A centralized government is one that concentrates power and decisions in the hands of a few people, usually the federal sphere (chief executive and ministers) has power and control over state and municipal spheres.
Decision making in an state can be centralized or decentralized. Centralization is the way in which the location of decision making is close to the top of the organization. Decentralization, on the other hand, puts pressure on the lower hierarchical levels to make decisions.
Well over 75% of citizens in Mexico practice Catholicism , so the answer would be True.
Luddite is a historically appropriate term as it interconnects with the same meaning and cause that occurred in the 19th century.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The real Luddites were the British weavers and craftsmen, around 19th century there was a labor movement against the mechanized manufacturers. People were loosing job as they were not needed anymore after the invention of machines.
Luddite is a historically appropriate term as it interconnects with the same meaning and cause that occurred in the 19th century. Today, the term Luddite refers to people who are against using the latest technology as the wont be man needed jobs as they being replaced by machines. Which not only makes the human beings lazy but also jobless.
Answer:
As the need for more land arose as a result of more farmers and more plantations (to create profit from) the government began to turn a blind eye to the continual pushing of colonists to the natives. During colonial times, it was ok as British limited westward expansion but once it was in the hands of the presidents, it was either to assimilate to US or be driven away. Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act 1830 and the Trail of Tears was the infamous name given to the forced Cherokee tribes away from their home in Georgia (bc of gold discovered a year before).
Answer:
Andrew Jackson opposed the establishment of a national, federal bank and he would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision. Furthermore, he denied that the ruling prevented him from vetoing legislation extending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson would also have opposed the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden, which he would have said expanded the Congress's power to cover interstate commerce to also include commercial navigation
