<u>Answer:</u>
<em>During</em><em> light downpour or day off,</em><em> teams can work; be that as it may, at whatever point the downpour or snow is </em><em>influencing perceivability</em><em> or there is lightning, a field group ought not be working. </em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
A <em>common problem in surveying</em> is to determine the altitudes of a series of points with respect to some reference point.
The <em>measurements are subject to error</em>, so more observations are taken than are strictly necessary to determine the altitudes, and the resulting over determined system is solved in the <em>least-squares sense to smooth out errors. </em>
Answer:
1 and a half months worth of depreciation
Explanation:
The advantage of starting to depreciate an asset purchased on December is that next year you will be able to depreciate it for a full year under MACRS. Generally, when you purchase an asset, you have to use the half year convention and your depreciation expense for the first year will be low compared to the second year. But if you start depreciating your asset in the current year, even if you purchased it on December and the depreciation expense is not that significant, the next year you will be able to depreciate it at the second year rate.
Answer:
4.96%
Explanation:
In order to determine the component after-tax cost of debt first we need to compute the before tax cost of debt by applying the RATE formula which is to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,155
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 8.25% ÷ 2 = $41.25
NPER = 40 years × 2 = 80 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula
1. The pretax cost of debt is 3.54% × 2 = 7.08%
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 7.08% × ( 1 - 0.30)
= 4.96%
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A car manufacturer installing expensive onboard GPS/navigation systems in all the cars it sells.
Explanation:
A tying agreement is the type of contractual arrangement where a seller offers other(s) product for the purchase of one good as a part of only one bundle. The secondary product might not be necessary but the seller offers it mainly to generate more profit. Tying arrangements are considered anti-competitive practices.
