Answer:
Safety Stock: 40 units
Explanation:
We need to solve for maximum demand we expect.
We desire a cycle-service level of 96% thus, our theoretical demand is where P(z) = 0.96
in the table we got that:
z = 1.75 p = 0.95994
z = 1.76 p = 0.96080
So we need to solve for X given:
a mean of 120
a deviation of 23
and z of 1.75
X = 160.25
Now we can calculate the desired safety stock:
160 x 1 - 120 x 1 = 160 - 120 = <em>40</em>
Both Joe and Rich should accept this project.
D) Both Joe and Rich
<u>Explanation:</u>
NPVJoe= $25,500 + $15,800 / 1.085 + $15,300 / 1.085^2
NPVJoe= $2,058.88
NPVRich= –$25,500 + $15,800 / 1.125 + $15,300 / 1.125^2
NPVRich= $633.33
Here Joe and Rich both invested a total amount of $25,500 and they are expected to get cash inflows of $15,800 and $15,300 in the year 1 and year 2 respectively they both has their own different rates of return i.e. 8.5% and 12.5% so we can calculate the net principle value of Joe is $2,058.88 and that of Rich is $633.33.
Answer:
C. The customer still owes $0.05
Explanation:
Four $20 bills= $ 80
Three $1 bills= $3
Six quarters = $1.50
One dime = $0.10
One nickel= $0.05
Five pennies = $0.005
Total= $84.7
Answer:
a per se violation of antitrust law.
Explanation:
The antitrust laws can be defined as those laws that are created by the US government to protect consumers from unfair means of competition in market. The aim of creating such laws is to ensure the protection of customers from corruptive business practices and also to ensure safe healthy competitive environment among same business companies.
<u>In the given scenario, the Association of Organic Food Growers is violating the antitrust law by boycotting farmers, ranchers, etc. The antitrust laws are violated by companies in several ways among them is by boycotting</u>.
Boycotting can be defined as an agreement between several companies that excludes a group of customers or market to avert them from buying aanyy goods or products.
This boycotting agreement is a per se violation of antitrust law.
