Answer:
This answer relates to the 1930's.
Explanation:
Appeasement was a policy pursued by European powers, in their dealings with Nazi Germany in order to avoid a repetition of WW1, namely another conflict engulfing Europe.
Many in the West supported Hitler as someone who was bringing stability to Germany and was an effective bastion against the Soviet Union and communism.
There was also the feeling that the Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on Germany and Hitler had justification for his territorial requests.
In 1935 the Saar once more became part of Germany after over 90% voted in favour in a plebiscite.
In 1936, Germany entered and remilitarised the Rhineland, in direct contravention of the Treaty of Versailles. Had this been stopped it may have led to a different path being taken by Hitler. however the West did nothing.
This encouraged Hitler to make further claims including the Anschluss with Austria in 1938.
Also in 1938, the Munich Agreement signed away the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia. The rest of Czechoslovakia was taken over in 1939.
Only when Germany attacked Poland did the West act with Britain and France declaring war.
Answer:
Britain defended its colonial policies by arguing that the colonists had <u>virtual</u> representation in Parliament. The colonists insisted they must have <u>actual</u> representation.
Explanation:
While the colonists insisted on having their own, legitimate representation in the British Parliament, British officials argued that they were already properly represented via virtual representation. According to them, the Parliament did not have in mind only the interests of those who elected its members but of all British subjects, of everyone who resided on the territory of the British Empire.
The Haitian rebellion was François-Dominique Toussaint Louverture.
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Answer:
The correct answer is A)
The Mosque of Selim II demonstrates the Sultan's ability to approve the interior organisation of a religious space.
Explanation:
The mosques' placement was compared by Gülru Necipoğlu, a leading Ottoman art historian, to that of a church’s altar. She stated that while the innovation on the interior disrupts the space below the dome, it indicated the Chief Architects' interest in outdoing Christian architecture.
The chief architect - Koca Mi'mâr Sinân Âğâ and also engineer provided his services to the Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, Selim II, and Murad III.
Of course, it is reasonable to expect that such a huge historically significant project will not take off without the express ratification of the Selim.
Cheers!
