The answer to your question is C. I just took the test and i got c as the correct answer.
The U.S. State of South Carolina and Columbia.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
Below are the answers:
<span>B.They often showed alphabets, numbers, poems, sayings, names, and birth dates.
C. They had borders with pictures of houses, birds, flowers, or trees.</span>
If they were still living, Carnegie and Rockefeller would have supported Net Neutrality.
<h3>What is Net Neutrality?</h3>
- Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers must not be discriminatory in their dispensation of internet services. Andrew Carnegie was a popular American industrialist and philanthropist.
- He made waves in the steel and railroad industries and he founded the Carnegie Steel Company. Despite his great wealth, he indulged greatly in philosophy.
- John D. Rockefeller was another American who excelled in the petroleum industry. He was so rich that he once had 2% of the American economy's worth. He was also a philanthropist.
- Given the personalities of these individuals, they must have supported Net neutrality if they were still alive.
Learn more about net neutrality here:
brainly.com/question/12859325
Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
