Under the ordinance, slavery was forever outlawed from the lands of the Northwest Territory, freedom of religion and other civil liberties were guaranteed, the resident Indians were promised decent treatment, and education was provided for.
More Americans were able to buy homes after the WWII because of the purchasing power of the American Dollar. In order for the country to experience a drastic economic change, it had to change its policies about taxes, cost of living, and personal wages of its people. So during that time period, people had a lot of money and decided to change their old ways of living in the city and moving into the suburbs to buy a lot and build their own houses there. They found that life was more peaceful and quaint as compared to the city life that's why there was a boom in suburban life after the WW.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same excerpt regarding popular sovereignty that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that in order for this to work, only the majority has to be satisfied--meaning that a large group of people (as big as 49.99%) will be ultimately unhappy. </span></span>
Great Britain and France were both winners and losers of the World War I. These two nations were winners because at the end they were on the side that won the war. Because of that they were also able to constrain their main enemy, and managed to have some benefits. But they were also losers in the war. This was because both of them had lot of damage in their infrastructure especially France. Both lost of lot soldiers which weakened them in a military sense, and both had huge economic losses and very fragile economies afterward. That eventually led to gradual loss of their power over their colonies, and after the World War II they lost them as they were where not able to control them anymore after the damage they had at home.
