Answer: C. Jack does not know if Lady Bracknell objects to the location of his house or the rule that says the location is unfashionable.
Explanation:
When Lady Bracknell asked Jack his house number in Belgrave Square, he told her 149. Lady Bracknell shook her head and said the side Jack was staying was unfashionable.
Jack was confused and asked her if she meant that the fashion, or the side could be changed. This shows that Jack is confused in this passage as he doesn't know if Lady Bracknell objects to the location of his house or the rule that says the location is unfashionable.
A character is a person or other being in a narrative
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.