1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
11

In Abel v. Baker, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in th

e same state is deciding Charles v. Delta, a case with similar facts. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the trial court is likely to
Law
1 answer:
tatuchka [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

The definition of stare decisis is “the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent.”

If the case is in the same state as the appellate court then the trial court will have to follow the precedent set by said appellate court. Most likely the case will be dismissed

You might be interested in
26. Confidentiality may be waived if the information (1 point)
Elis [28]

Answer:

Could change the jurors' final verdict

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What is not a major type of cybercrime reported to the ic3?
frosja888 [35]

Answer: malware fraud.

Explanation: The internet crime complaint centre also referred to as IC3 is to provide people with a reporting mechanism that is convenient to submit information to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) regarding certain criminal activity done via the internet and create a strong bond/alliance with law enforcement agents and partners of the industry. Information is gathered, analyzed and disseminated to the public in order to create awareness as well as for investigative purposes. The crimes reported in ic3 include identity theft, government impersonation scam and advance fee fraud. The malware fraud which is malicious software that can alter the function of a computer. It is not a major form of cybercrime reported to the Internet Crime Complaint Centre.

7 0
3 years ago
Is amoung us sussy?!?!?!?!??! NEED TO KNOW WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!
o-na [289]

Answer:

yes it is very

Explanation:

because it is

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. 16-1371 Byrd v. United State
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

United States decision stated that a lawful driver of a rental car has a reasonable expectation of privacy, even if the car has been rented by someone else and they are not listed as an authorized driver on the rental agreement.

Explanation:

hope i helped

4 0
3 years ago
Sc friends.... only 14 and uppp
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

?

Explanation:

What do you mean.

People 14 and up who live in South Carolina?

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone help me please!<br> Government
    14·1 answer
  • What was the most significant result of the ruling in Marbury v. Madison? The ruling narrowed the powers of the federal governme
    6·2 answers
  • Х<br> What is NYS law/policy regarding the non-voluntary<br> civil commitment of sex offenders?
    11·1 answer
  • If you need to park your vehicle beside a highway,
    5·2 answers
  • Hearing is a process, and listening is<br> a process.
    12·1 answer
  • An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
    10·1 answer
  • Thanks you
    13·1 answer
  • Xác định các bộ phận giả định, quy định, chế tài trong các điều luật sau:
    14·1 answer
  • To what extent has law reform been effective in dealing with discrimination in the workplace?
    7·1 answer
  • At the age of 13 my mother planned to get married and change mine and my 8 year old brothers last name to Smith and i hated that
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!