Question

Which of the following was the result in Eric Lucier and Karen A. Haley v. Angela and James Williams, Cambridge Associates, LTD., and Al Vasys, the case in the textbook involving a home inspection that allegedly failed to reveal a bad roof, in which some defendants moved for partial summary judgment seeking enforcement of a limitation of liability clause contained in the contract at issue

Answer 1

A. Substantive unconscionability B. Adhesion conscionabilityC. Procedural unconscionabilityD. Exculpatory clausesE. An inparidelictoagreement.

Substantive unconscionably

Answer: Option A.

Explanation:

Unconscionability (now and then known as unconscionable managing/lead in Australia) is a teaching in contract law that depicts terms that are so very out of line, or overwhelmingly uneven for the gathering who has the predominant haggling power, that they are in opposition to great inner voice.

Substantive unconscionability alludes to the unconscionability in the details of an agreement. It implies that the target terms of the agreement are uncalled for. Substantive unconscionability results when agreement terms are unnecessarily abusive or cruel.