Skinner's theory of operant conditioning was developed as a result of his discovery of the law of effect influence.
I hope this helps you
:)
In respect of the above-mentioned question regarding the order in Marylands court can be placed- Court of Appeals, Court of Special Appeals, Circuit Courts, District Court.
The overall outcome of the Marbury vs madison case was that the judicial review was established and thus a stronghold of the federal judiciary was also maintained. Hence, option C is appropriate.
The Court of appeals can be compared to the SupremeCourt of the United States. Hence, option D is appropriate.
After the case of Marbury vs madison was over Marbury died. Hence, the above statement is false, therefore option B is appropriate.
<h3>What happened in the madison Vs Marbury case?</h3>
The Madison vs Marbury case showed the world the most important thing regarding the notion and understanding of the most important people and also a lot to be helped about. The case gave the United States to strengthen its Federal judiciary. For the first time, Judicial review was introduced in the court by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about the Marbury Vs Madison case here:
brainly.com/question/12300066
#SPJ1
Answer:
Reserved powers
Federalism describes the system of shared governance between national ... both exclusive and concurrent powers, which help to explain the negotiation ... the Constitution envisioned that state governments, not the national government, ... Exclusive powers are those powers reserved to the federal government or the states.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Early people and communities <u>hunted in groups</u>, whatever resources were available were shared equally among them. Hence, Option A is the correct choice.
<h3>What do you understand by social equality?</h3>
Social equality refers to a situation wherein all people inside a particular society have the same rights, liberties, and status, likely together with civil rights, freedom of expression, autonomy, and same get right of entry to positive public items and social services.
Therefore, Early people and communities <u>hunted in groups</u>, whatever resources were available were shared equally among them. Option A is the correct choice.
Learn more about social equality here:
brainly.com/question/796682
#SPJ1
