Explanation:
<em>Is there any paragraph or any answer choices ?</em>
<em>This question can not be answered without a paragraph or something to look to conclude</em>
Apex several of people recently died from morgellons disease which is thought to be linked gentically modified foods
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide options or the statements, we can say that statement expresses an assumption behind the articles of confederation that is not behind the US constitution could be the following: "the main principle of the Articles of Confederation was the
the sovereignty of organized power and the independence of the separate or disunited States."
Then, President Adams continued saying that according to the US Constitution, the role of the central government was to serve the citizens of the United States and that each state had to resolve their own administrative issues.
Let's remember that the Articles of Confederation was the first US Constitution, but left a weak central government that depended so much on the states. That is why delegates met at the Constitutional Convention of Philadelphia in 1787, to sign the United States Constitution.
Thomas Paine's impassioned arguments led the cause of the French and the American revolutions.
Explanation:
Thomas Paine was one of the leading thinkers of the post Augustan age and was a formative influence in the thought of the French and American revolutions.
His egalitarian and emancipator discourse was responsible for the vigor of the revolution to be instilled in the common populace, often induced by such rhetoric as here.
These impassioned questions make sure to drive home the corruption of the clergy and the upper class to full force.
Answer:
Had infringed Juliens patent because Gomez machine was the same as that of Julien
Explanation:
Julien was granted a patent for his invention. The patent right given to him means only him has the exclusive right to reproduce or make other machines of the same mechanism type and design.
If Gomez then developed a similar machine that differed in the shape of the mechanism used to drop the seedling into the furrow and Julien sued Gomez for patent infringement then the court most likely found that Gomez had infringed Juliens patent because Gomez machine was the same as that of Julien.
