1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
7

How were Egyptian gods commonly depicted​

History
2 answers:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Most Egyptian gods represented one principle aspect of the world: Ra was the sun god, for example, and Nut was goddess of the sky. ... When a god was angry, she might be portrayed as a ferocious lioness; when gentle, a cat. The convention was to depict the animal gods with a human body and an animal head.

Explanation:

im having a good day so i will further explain there usually portrayed with animal heads there almost like greek gods now depicted means drawing so come to think of it they've never seen the gods before so the draw what they would look like so the draw them with animal heads to describe them.

if you didn't understand ill explain more

Mkey [24]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

Most Egyptian gods represented one principle aspect of the world: Ra was the sun god, for example, and Nut was goddess of the sky. ... When a god was angry, she might be portrayed as a ferocious lioness; when gentle, a cat. The convention was to depict the animal gods with a human body and an animal head.

You might be interested in
Where can Greek architecture be seen today?
likoan [24]
Warehouses would be right
3 0
2 years ago
What effect did u.s. troops have on the allied fight against the central powers
mote1985 [20]

they were stronger than the men who had been in the trenches for a while

they called them dough boys since they were well fed and had good living conditions before going to war

8 0
2 years ago
How did the fall of Rome reshape the wester world in the mideval period
Vanyuwa [196]

The Fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called Fall of the Roman Empire or Fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which it failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control; modern historians mention factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperor, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from "barbarians" outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2]

Relevant dates include 117 CE, when the Empire was at its greatest territorial extent, and the accession of Diocletian in 284. Irreversible major territorial loss, however, began in 376 with a large-scale irruption of Goths and others. By 476 when Odoacer deposed the Emperor Romulus, the Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Invading "barbarians" had established their own power in most of the area of the Western Empire. While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again.

The Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a long-term effect of the nuclear bombs dropped on japan?
alexandr402 [8]
I would go with 
A.an end to a hostile relationship with Russia
5 0
3 years ago
What is not a domestic power of congress?
Anna [14]
As interpreted by the Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), this clause means that Congress<span> can assume other </span>powers<span> and pass laws in order to fulfill its duties. The </span>powers<span> granted by the necessary and proper clause are called implied</span>powers<span>.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following people would most likely resist the supreme courts decision in Brown v. Board of Education A. An African
    10·2 answers
  • What basic assumption of social Darwinism would Africans most likely agree with
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Hitler focus on harming Jewish people during his rule of Germany? A. Hitler was convinced by his generals that Jews were
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT TRUE regarding the government established by the constitution
    14·2 answers
  • How was the Black Death spread throughout Europe?
    13·1 answer
  • Which communications device became a fixture in U.S. homes during the 1920s?
    7·1 answer
  • What is task separation? <br><br> Answer asap will mark as brainliest
    7·2 answers
  • These towering Buddhists temples are common in China.
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the Philippines colonized by Spain? Explain​
    6·1 answer
  • 1)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!