All categories

3 years ago

Co-marketing refers to _____.

Business

1 answer:

Valentin [98]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: Option D

Explanation: In simple words, co- marketing refers to the process in which two firms of an industry, who serves the same audience, combines ther resources for increasing their scale of operations with the ultimate goal of increasing profits.

Generally such arrangements do not happen between two major competitors in an industry. This is more common in international businesses where one firm has technology and other has customer base.

Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D .

You might be interested in

The All-Star Basic Value Fund's portfolio is valued at $250 million. The fund has liabilities of $23 million, and the fund’s net

svetoff [14.1K]

$13.27 is the fund's number of shares outstanding

Solution:

Given,

The All-Star Basic Value Fund's portfolio is valued at $250 million

Liabilities of $23 million

Net asset value = 17,100,000

Now ,

To find , fund's number of shares outstanding :

NAV = ($250 million - $23 million)/17.1 million = $13.27

$13.27 is the fund's number of shares outstanding

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.

Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0

3 years ago

Explain the hipp of the primary sources below source: letter written by john rolfe

jekas [21]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Explain the HIPP of the primary sources below source: "letter written by John Rolfe."

"H" stands for Historical context. John Rolf was an important component in the foundation and success of the Jamestown, Virginia colony, in the North American territory. In the letter, he explains the Governor of the colony, Thomas Dale, his reasons to marry Pocahontas, a Native American Indian woman.

"I" stands for the Intended audience. The Governor of Jamestown, Virginia colony, Thomas Dale. The intention of John Rolfe was to clearly explain his motives, trying to maintain his intact reputation before the people of Jamestown.

"P" stands for Purpose. Rolfe wanted the approval of the Governor, knowing that in those years, Native American Indians were considered savages that first needed to be converted to the Christian religion to be accepted in the colonial society.

"P" stands for Point of view. In this part, we have to understand the point the author is trying to convey. In this case, John Rolfe, an English man, and an important figure that brought the toc¿bacco seed from the Caribbean Islands to grow tobacco crops in Jamestown and made tobacco the king of crops in Virginia wanted to justify his actions but not wanted to compromise his position before the Jamestown society.

6 0

3 years ago

Exercise 4-11 Computing net sales for multiple-step income statement LO P4 A company reports the following sales-related informa

dezoksy [38]

Answer:

Net sales revenue= 220,100

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Sales, gross $ 245,000

Sales returns and allowances $ 20,000

Sales discounts 4,900

Sales salaries expense 10,900

<u>Sales salaries expense is not a part of the net sales in a multiple-step income statement. The net sales are as follow:</u>

Sales= 245,000

Sales returns and allowances= (20,000)

Sales discounts= (4,900)

Net sales revenue= 220,100

4 0

3 years ago

Looking back over the last ten years or so, what was changed in your workplace? What do you think will happen next in your work

avanturin [10]

As 2020 draws near, it’s hard not to reflect on the past decade- so much has changed in the 10 years that flew by. In 2010, those who even had a smartphone were carrying around an iPhone 4 or a BlackBerry OS 6.0 version.

While the illustrious BlackBerry has all but disappeared from the workplace of 2019, there has been plenty of technologies in its wake to replace it. Let’s take a look at how the workplace has changed, communication tools and otherwise, in the past decade.

1. Collaboration over competition

“So many things have happened in the last decade that have really accelerated this change from competition to collaboration,” said Ann Shoket, workplace thought leader and former Editor-In-Chief of Seventeen Magazine.

“So first of all this old idea that there was room at the table for one woman, and you would fight tooth or nail for that spot, so obviously there was a lot of competition, particularly among women.

“Then the next generation, Millennial women, came in and made more room at the table and brought their friends along with them. That was the shift toward collaboration.”

2. It’s an employee market, not an employer market

“Reflecting back on 2010 and what the economic circumstances were versus where we are at today, the competition for talent was very different in 2010 than as we enter 2020,” said Rhiannon Staples, the Chief Marketing Officer at Hibob.

Low unemployment rates today mean that job seekers have more options, and employees have more leverage in terms of what they can expect of their company due to the competition for top talent.

“It really is on businesses to help develop an environment, a culture, and perks that really draw the best talent in the market,” Staples said. “That’s really very different from where we were just 10 years ago.”

3. Push towards a more remote workforce

Anyone in the workforce 10 years ago won’t be shocked that the change in when and where we work made this list. Whereas in the past remote work was reserved for special situations, that kind of idea is now replaced by a lot more freedom of where you work and when you work, and that’s not just people who are entrepreneurs. This idea is something that everybody wants out of work, to have a more flexible time frame to be free from the office. This idea of freedom is such an important piece of where we are going at work.

“That kind of idea is now replaced by a lot more freedom of where you work and when you work, and that’s not just people who are entrepreneurs,” Shoket said. “This idea is something that everybody wants out of work, to have a more flexible time frame to be free from the office. This idea of freedom is such an important piece of where we are going at work.”

8 0

3 years ago