1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
myrzilka [38]
3 years ago
6

Why were Texas oil producers ordered to limit production during the Great

History
2 answers:
Romashka [77]3 years ago
6 0
A. Texas oil fields were in danger of drying up
Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C or Overproduction was causing prices to drop.

Explanation:

Why were Texas oil producers ordered to limit production during the Great Depression?

a.

Texas oil fields were in danger of running dry.

b.

Oklahoma needed a chance to break into the oil market.

c.

Overproduction was causing prices to drop.

d.

Too many shantytowns were springing up in East Texas.

You might be interested in
Which detail does not describe the life and achievements of Silas Hunt?
Nady [450]

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

I just took the test✨

6 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply.
butalik [34]
1,2,3 and i think 5 im not 100% sure but i hop this helps  :)
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain una
Alik [6]

Answer:

The third sentence is a clear example of the concept of social contract.

Explanation:

The idea of social contract became important during the Enlightenment because it established that the power lies in the people and not in the figurehead of government.  The French writer Rousseau is one of the Enlightenment thinkers that popularized the term.  This concept goes on to explain that if the government is not serving its people and is not acting in the people's best interest, then the people have the right to remove it and place a new government in its place.  This can clearly be seen in the third sentence.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Once Congress declares war and the President assumes the role of Commander-in-Chief who decides how the war ends?​
Inessa [10]

Answer:

Both? here let me explain...

Explanation:

If you want to get technical, once the President assumes the Role of Commander in Chief of the United States Military he has control over all military action while congress; per the original intent of the constitution, has control over starting war and ending it. If you really had to choose one or the other the Commander in Chief has in most occurrences decided how war ends. I really hope this helped, if not my apologies and if you need any more elaboration please let me know down in the comments and I will do my best.

 

8 0
2 years ago
Who is william mckinley
riadik2000 [5.3K]
He is the 25th president of the United States from March 4, 1897 until his assassination in September 1901
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What 2 countries increased their military spending the most between 1910-1914
    11·2 answers
  • If you were to travel to a new location, you would need information about it
    11·1 answer
  • How did the church play a vital role in medieval life?
    6·1 answer
  • Question 2
    14·1 answer
  • Why did george washington refuse to take a salary for being commander in chief?
    15·2 answers
  • What are riis attitude towards povert
    15·1 answer
  • Name and explain 3 big differences between the North and the South and why you think these differences created enough conflict t
    9·2 answers
  • Why did Abraham Lincoln order his generals to wage "Total War" on the South?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states a similarity between Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry?
    7·2 answers
  • What era occurred in the United States
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!