a. ONE major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that David M. Potter described the Civil War as an inevitable event given the institutionalized sectionalism between the North and the South. On the other hand, Michael F. Holt held that the Civil War was an anomaly in American compromise-reaching political tradition.
b. ONE specific historical event or development during 1786-1861 that could support Potter's interpretation is the breakdown of the two-party system. This development pitted far-right democratic republicanism, which promoted white supremacy, whereas center-right republicanism accepted black equality.
Another historical development to support Potter's interpretation is that the South welcomed the Jim Crow laws and sanctioned the separation principle. On the other hand, the North sought to overturn the law and practice of separatism.
c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. During the Great Compromise of 1787, healthy rivalry ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Thus, David M. Potter held that the ingrained divisions between the North and the South caused the Civil War, while Michael F. Holt held that the breakdown of the two-party system occasioned the Civil War.
Learn more about the different historical interpretations of the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/11705791
Answer:
The Tuskegee Airmen reflect the struggle of African Americans to achieve equal rights, not only through legal attacks on the system of segregation, but also through the techniques of nonviolent direct action aimed at segregation in the military.
Explanation:
Answer:
For countries to get land and have more wealth so that they could be rich. This is the reason
Explanation:
WW2 wasn't started for fun, it was to invade countries to get land. Here are a few facts:
World War II, which took place between September 1939 and September 1945, was the bloodiest conflict in human history. Though no exact casualty count for the war exists, it is thought that up to 85 million people were killed as a direct or indirect result of the conflict. The war involved all of the world’s great powers, and touched nearly every corner of the globe. On one side was the Axis, led by Germany, Italy, and Japan. On the other side were the Allies, led by the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and the Soviet Union. There were numerous reasons for the outbreak of the Second World War, from the megalomaniac ambitions of ruthless dictators, to the unprovoked attacks on countries that precipitated their entry into the war. Here are the main causes for the outbreak of WWII, humanity’s most destructive conflict.
False. Watchdogs should check on the activites of leaders. A party in power can.t check on itself.
