I will assume you mean the Homestead Act of 1862, which was the first and most iconic one. In that case, the requirements were that the homesteader, the one filing the claim, be either the head of the household OR twenty-one years old, they had to live only on the designated land, build a home, improve it, and farm the land for five years, and, finally, they had to be a United States citizen that had never taken up arms against America.
Stop racism, segregation and sexist
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The existence of many and conflicting moral viewpoints means that, logically, there are no answers to moral questions but the individual has to develop their own moral concepts that are going to be applied when it decides on an ethical issue.
Ethics studies the moral acts of human beings. Morals study the decisions that stem from the conscience. So there is no logic or reasoning because every individual has its set of moral rules or standards, depending on its culture, race, ethnicity, values, or traditions. So when the individual is about to make a decision, he or she is aware that there is going to be consequences from that decision and the individual has to live by those consequences.
What effect did trade with China have on religion in Japan?
-> It introduced Buddhism.
Theology, I hope that helps!!!!
