Answer:
Dear Mr. Malik
I write this letter to talk to you about your nephew Jhonny and to emphasize the importance of having you as a support for his academic life.
As you may already know, Jhonny is a spectacular teenager who shows a strong talent for English and literature classes, although he has difficulties in other subjects, which is normal for most young people. We all believe that Jhonny has a bright future ahead of him, but unfortunately he has no resources of his own to move forward with his dreams, needing a lot of your support.
You more than I know that Jhonny cannot count on his parents to support his studies, since you are the closest and most important relative in this regard. Adult support is highly important for academic development and a promising future professional life.
I am sure that Jhonny is very grateful for everything you do for him and is very sad and shaken by the possibility of losing his support, but he has difficulties in telling you, which motivates me to write this letter.
I appreciate your understanding and hope that I have managed to change your opinion.
Kind regards,
Agatha Melly.
Answer:
b. paraphrasing plagiarism
Explanation:
The correct answer is paraphrasing plagiarism because in the given scenario the writer has just extracted the main idea and composed it with his own words. The writer has not mentioned the corresponding author's reference in the text. The patriarchal perspective of maternal is used by writer. Word to word plagiarism is one in which author takes sequence of seven or more words from other sources.
Answer:
The agent probably knew about the murderer, because the accused only bought a ticket to return from the trip.
Explanation:
When the friend bought the travel tickets, he did not buy two tickets back, but only one, that is, he knew that his friend would not return, although he did buy two one-way tickets. Thus, this individual becomes the main suspect in the murder, since only the two friends were on the trip and it is necessary to investigate all the possibilities of his friend's death.
In this case, the police contacted the travel agent who passed all the ticket purchase information between the two friends.
<span>It uses a respectful tone and offers researched evidence to effectively refute the counterclaim.</span>
