I think the answer to your question is A
Hope i helped
Cheers,
Belive1234
Direct evidence does not require any reasoning or inference to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence.
Example: If a person testified that he or she looked outside a window and saw rain falling, that is direct evidence that it rained.
Indirect evidence, requires that an inference be made between the evidence and the conclusion to be drawn from it.
Example: If, on the other hand, a witness testified that he or she heard distant pitter patter, and later walked outside and saw that the ground was wet, smelled freshness in the air and felt that the air was moist, those sensations would be indirect evidence that it had rained.
I believe it would be the first option, "periods of uncertainity"
Answer:
In chapter 5 it is shown how the food companies are using chemical processes to divide corn into parts, and in this way, they are producing corn syrup.
Explanation:
Those products are entering supermarkets. Food companies are working hard to come up with new ideas to use corn so that the whole amount could be eaten.
In the past, corn was clean food that was used like that. However, today, it can be cut to elements and combined in different ways, like corn syrup. It shows that technology and man had changed the way people eat today.
