The inverse relation of the function f(x)=1/3x*2-3x+5 is f-1(x) = 9/2 + √(3x + 21/4)
<h3>How to determine the inverse relation?</h3>
The function is given as
f(x)=1/3x^2-3x+5
Start by rewriting the function in vertex form
f(x) = 1/3(x - 9/2)^2 -7/4
Rewrite the function as
y = 1/3(x - 9/2)^2 -7/4
Swap x and y
x = 1/3(y - 9/2)^2 -7/4
Add 7/4 to both sides
x + 7/4= 1/3(y - 9/2)^2
Multiply by 3
3x + 21/4= (y - 9/2)^2
Take the square roots
y - 9/2 = √(3x + 21/4)
This gives
y = 9/2 + √(3x + 21/4)
Hence, the inverse relation of the function f(x)=1/3x*2-3x+5 is f-1(x) = 9/2 + √(3x + 21/4)
Read more about inverse functions at:
brainly.com/question/14391067
#SPJ1
Answer: $28,752
Explanation:
The<u> definition of bimonthly</u> is an event that happens once in two months.
represents "two", while
represents "event that happens by month.
Given that Glenda receives a salary of <u>$4,792 bi-monthly</u>, we are required to find the earnings per year.
There are <u>12 months in each year</u>, and if the given value is a 2-month value, then we shall divide 12 by 2 to find that there is in total 6 of the 2-month value.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a22bb/a22bb74d7ae9046b41075870fc1571d1d2ca5ec0" alt="12/2=6"
Finally, we shall <u>multiply the total number with the salary</u>, which will be $4,792 times 6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce9d1/ce9d121bd36025bb32e97149d509d688326ffeb1" alt="4792*6=\boxed{28752}"
Hope this helps!! :)
Please let me know if you have any questions
12=8 18=12 24=16 (find 2/3 of each one)
So 8, 12 and 16
(a) Using the table, give the values fo rthe inverse
1) original table of values:
x 1 2 3 4 5
f(x) 0 1 1 5 3
2) The inverse of the function is obtained by exchanging x and f(x), this is:
( x, f(x) ) → ( f(x), x)
3) So, the table of values of the inverse of the given function is:
x 0 1 1 5 3
f⁻¹ (x) 0 1 2 3 4
(b) Is the inverse a function?
No, the inverse is not a function, since the table of the inverse shows that the x -value 1 has two different images.
This ambigüity is opposite to the definition of a function, which requires that any input value has only one output. For that reason, the inverse is not a function. You cannot tell whether the image of 1 is 1 or 2, because both are images of the same value.