What’s your question exactly do u have an image to show
Answer: Corona virus
Explanation:
To fight the pandemic, Biden has a plan that would provide “free public testing and rapid deployment of supplies, as well as economic measures such as emergency paid leave and the creation of a state and local emergency fund.” Additionally, his plan would provide resources for food relief and remote student learning. He sides with “science, not fiction and fear,” and predicted in January 2020 “the outbreak of a new coronavirus… [that would] get worse before it gets better.”
Okay will do sir or ma’am
Answer:
d. Whether the statute has a secular legislative purpose and whether the statute's principal or primary effect either advances or inhibits religion; and also whether the statute fosters an excessive government entanglement with religion
Explanation:
The establishment clause is related to the first amendment of the US constitution. This clause refers to the freedom of religion that should be allowed in the country, as it states that the government is prohibited from establishing and imposing a single religion on all citizens of the country, as well as preventing citizens from following the religion they desire. .
Accordingly, whether the statute has a secular legislative objective and whether the primary or primary effect of the statute promotes or inhibits religion; and also if the statute promotes excessive government involvement with religion means that the government statute is violating the Establishment Clause.
Answer:
<u><em>True</em></u>
Explanation:
<em>The Telecommunications Act of 1996</em> was the first act to overhaul the telecommunication law. The act was passed to let anyone enter the communications business, to allow competition in communications business and implement single layer of regulation in the federal level.
It was passed by congress in January 1996, and president Bill Clinton signed it in February 1996. It allowed the companies who were serving the local market to enter the long distance market.
This deregulation broke the monopolies within the local exchange areas. The new regulations forced the local barriers to share the communications facilities with the competitors and ensured that each company was treated in an equitable and fair manner.
