The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Yes, the growing number of interest groups support US Senator Byrd’s conclusion.
There is too much money involved in interest groups, and an increasing number of these groups have been appearing in the United States political scene. Senator Byrd was worried about this increased number and lack of control over these groups. Let's have in mind that these interest groups hire lobbyists to negotiate with legislators and offer support. But the US Congressmen had to be aware that it is the citizens that voted for them and put them in Congress as their representatives. So they serve the people, not the particular agendas of interest groups.
I believe the answer is c.1920. However, I could be wrong.
<span>The best way to get young people involved is to allow people the opportunity to relate to those in power. As of now the political process is focused on what happens in Washington. Those in power tend to be older and use traditional methods which can turn a younger crowd off. The use of social media would help to get those involved. The other side to this is that most politicians vote on party lines and if your representative is of an opposite party you may feel your voice will not be heard. The solution is to work towards a more bipartisan system that allows for public surveys to sway votes.
The other solution is to get younger people more involved on the local system of government. Use of social media and surveys to not only inform constituents and include them in the process would allow many to feel as though their voice is being heard and that they can make a difference.</span>
There are numerous mountains in Japan and they were an obstacle towards unifying the country. Since many parts of Japan waged wars against others, it was difficult to fight in other people's regions since they had the mountains to their advantage so there was a difficulty in uniting every part of Japan through wars, like it was done in numerous other countries.
