The sentence that is rewritten in the subjunctive mood is option A) I wish I were going to the movies with you this Friday”
The subjunctive mood is used in formal written English to express unreal conditions, suggestions or wishes. In this case, the example is related to wishes and it is formed by the word “wish” and the verb in the subjunctive voice is “were going”. As we can see the auxiliary “were” does not keep the same form of the person “I” because it is in the subjunctive mood.
Option B is not in the subjunctive mood, it is using an indicative mood
Option C is not in the subjunctive mood since it is a question in the present tense.
The Transcendentalists were radical thinkers. At the time of their meetings, New England was still holding on to a remnant of Puritanical values. There was a sense that organized religion had authority over one's personal life and individual choices. For the Transcendentalists, this was a big no-no! They were quite critical of conformity, or forcing one's behavior to match social expectations or standards. They were nonconformists - people who do not conform to a generally accepted pattern of thought or action. They rejected common ideas and practices, particularly organized religion. There wasn't a Transcendentalist church or a holy book of Transcendentalism. Instead, there were regular meetings for lively conversation and a shared hope of cultivating a modern, fluid, and personal sense of spirituality.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read I Am Very Real, By Kurt Vonnegut, 1973
Which statement best describes how the author uses rhetoric in
paragraphs 4-5 to advance his argument? *
The author presents the contributions he has made to the country in order to prove that he is a real American
The author describes his background in order to explain why coarse language is simply part of how he speaks.
The author portrays himself as a father and a veteran as further proof of his desire to shield the nation's youth from harmful books.
The author explains that he is a man of integrity in order to show why the school's reactions were excessive and wrong.
Answer: The author explains that he is a man of integrity in order to show why the school's reactions were excessive and wrong.
Explanation:
Vonnegut defends his integrity to show that having his book and his entire work deemed as evil was wrong. He presents his actions after the burning of his books, doing "absolutely nothing to exploit the disgusting
news from Drake," as evidence of his integrity. Furthermore, he describes himself as a loving father and an honored veteran to better support his argument.
We spilled our vegetable seeds; now we have petunias growing in our beets.
I'm pretty sure that that would mean you have beets growing in ur petunias if you spilled ur VEGGIE seeds.<span />
