in this conversation, which discussion technique does anna most clearly show? daniel: this is all well and good, but we're assum
ing plato is giving us the real facts about socrates. here, chambers writes, "it's possible socrates refused to back down because he wanted to do the right thing. it's equally possible his ego took over his tongue, in which case he could be considered conceited and righteous. yetplato leads us down the path to piety." so if im reading this right, socrates might not be the amazing guy plato makes him out to be. jennifer: but even if it was his ego that got in the way, didn't he still make a sacrifice? he could have begged the jury to let him go. anna: but plato didn't write anything about socrates's ego, right? daniel: i'm not sure. didn't read plato's account, just chambers's article. a. identifying missing information. b. synthesizing claims. c. confirming the question. d. establishing roles
The discussion technique that Anna most clearly show is (A) identifying missing information. In the conversation, this is shown when Anna asks whether Plato wrote anything about Socrates's ego. By making these questions, she is identifying missing information because that is made to obtain the information requested.
Option A (Operational definition) is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
Operational meaning indicates whether dependent parameters are computed or assessed. After that, this same puzzle shows what further talent certain individuals possess.
The hypothesis implies either the alleged outcome as well as the possible outcome. However no variety of promotional or theory approach.
The other alternative is not related to the given scenario. So the above option is the appropriate one.
Some people may be able to describe something in great detail in a text, or include quotes from an interview but they can't bring concepts to life through text without something to see, but things on a video such as animation does allow people to bring concepts; and ideas to life.
In to kill a mockingbird, the author characterize the crowd of community members who attend the trial as interested, excitable spectators, hoping to witness the drama unfold before their eyes.
