The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
<span>In order to vary the sentence structure, the sentence I would insert in the blank is C. Have you noticed how hard she works? The reason for this is because inserting an interrogative sentence that has a completely different structure and word order than the other two sentences works great in order to introduce some versatility into a paragraph consisting of a couple of sentences. Here, the only sentence that differs is C. which is why you should choose it. Starting three sentences in a row with the same word can be a bit dull and repetitive. </span>
Answer:
To create the plot of the play.
Explanation:
The original material that Shakespeare used was taken from the story "Un Capitano Moro" written by Cinthio almost 100 years earlier, which tells the story of a very eloquent and honorable black man who became a great general, but who was betrayed by a man who pretended to be your ally. Shakespeare used this as a basis for creating and writing the entire Othelo storyline.
Answer:
Poseidon is the answer I should know I am reading greek mythology like tomorrow is the end of the world
Explanation:
I agree because everyone struggles everyday. i doubt anyone wakes up everyday completely stress-free. we are all human in this sense, it is the human condition. when people are given the chance to make decisions with hardly any repercussions, they will not always do what is expected of them. it morally destroys empathy and modesty.
