Answer:
d. The higher the risk, the lower the possible investment.
Explanation:
With regards to speculation, hazard can be characterized as the changeability of return. the contrast between real result and expected result can be called as hazard. In the given model, Sandy think about that there is a positive connection between the likelihood of hazard and returns. for example on the off chance that there is high hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is high. in the event that there is less hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is low.
Right now, likes to go with if the higher the hazard, the lower the potential ventures, in light of the fact that the inconstancy of profits is high. Means the financial specialist could conceivably get the profits, consequently they may like to go with certain and ensured returns than dubious more significant yields. In the region of ventures it is a typical inquiry to all, some may go with higher the hazard the lower the conceivable speculation.
Henceforth, the appropriate response is option D.
In the event that an announcement is there that the higher the hazard, the bigger the potential returns, it doesn't imply that the speculator gets more significant yields with his ventures. the odds are there to get more significant yields simultaneously there are a few issues moreover.
Answer:
The recent loss of 440 manufacturing jobs at Ford Australia has generated a lot of debate about the long-term viability of the Australian car industry, and manufacturing in general. This debate has included arguments that manufacturing is important and needs more government support. It has also seen some commentators argue that Australian’s have no right to expect jobs in manufacturing.
While most of this debate has focused on the automotive manufacturing sector, there is a wider question that needs to be answered. This relates to the issue of whether it is feasible for an advanced economy to grow and prosper without a manufacturing sector?
Explanation:
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
<u>Answer: </u>A is core competence
<u>Explanation:</u>
Core competence is the common term that is used by an organisation to define its multiple resources and skills that are not similar to any one else in the market. Core competence is also the strategic advantage that a business possess in the market.
The strength of the organisation helps it attract many customers and tap all the opportunities in the market at the right time to achieve success. The core competence of the organisation cannot be easily identified or imitated by the competitors in the market.
Answer:
D)3 points
Explanation:
When children are involved, seatbelt tickets may mean points.
You won't typically get points if cited for failing to wear your seatbelt, but in New York, if you are ticketed for having a child in the car under age 16 without a seatbelt, the violation adds 3 points to your driving record. A seatbelt ticket will raise your rates by an average of three percent
