Answer: Sentence 4
Explanation:
The sentence that clarifies meaning of
<em>They brought home a baby sister for their son named Julia</em> is :<em>They brought home a baby named Julia, who was the sister of her brother.
</em>
The sentence is a bit confusing because the reduced relative or adjectival clause, named Julia, is separated from its anticident, sister ,by the prepositional phrase, for their son.
Answer:
Hi Fatimah,
Its so good to hear from you. I'm doing good. How about you? The jewelry your making sounds so cool. I recently started a new hobby of gardening, it is so peaceful working outside with the plants. I'm growing a lot of things like tomatoes and watermelon and peppers. Its crazy how fast the plants grow every morning when I wake up I can pick fresh veggies for my morning omelette. I hope your doing well, Talk to you soon, -Aziz
Explanation:
Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
Despite the historical focus, many elements of the story are fictitious. I think that should be right
