1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lorico [155]
4 years ago
13

A type of language that varies from the norms of literal language

Social Studies
1 answer:
Oduvanchick [21]4 years ago
8 0
French would be the answer
You might be interested in
Why did the United States acquire the Oregon Territory through a treaty and the Mexican Cession through war?
Snezhnost [94]

Explanation:

  Along with territorial disputes with Spain and Mexico over the Southwest, the fate of the Oregon Territory was one of the major diplomatic issues of the first half of the 19th century.

Landscape in Oregon Country (Charles Marion Russell)

The territory became a focus of those who believed that it was the United States’ obligation and right to extend its rule and liberties across the North American continent. The Oregon Territory stretched from the Pacific coast to the Rocky Mountains, encompassing the area including present-day Oregon, Washington, and most of British Columbia.

Originally Spain, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States claimed the territory. In 1819, under terms of the Transcontinental Treaty, Spain ceded its claims to the territory to the United States. Shortly thereafter the United States contested a unilateral Russian move to grant its citizens a fishing, whaling, and commercial monopoly from the Bering Straits to the 51st parallel. In 1823 President Monroe promulgated his doctrine, which put Russia on notice that the United States did not accept Russian attempts at monopoly. The U.S. claim was based on the explorations of Lewis and Clark and on the establishment of trading posts set up by John Jacob Astor’s Pacific Fur Company, such as Astoria at the mouth of the Columbia River. Great Britain based its claim, in part, on James Cook’s exploration of the Columbia River.

John Jacob Astor

As early as 1818 British and American Commissioners had fixed the border between the United States and Canada at the 49th parallel from the Lake of the Woods (Minnesota Territory) west to the Rocky Mountains. The United States had proposed to extend the border along the same parallel to the Pacific Ocean, but Great Britain insisted that the northern border be drawn west to the Columbia River and then follow that river to the ocean. Neither side then budged, but they did agree to postpone the decision for 10 years. In 1827 Washington and London agreed to postpone the issue indefinitely subject to one year’s notice by either party. There the matter remained until the Webster-Ashburton Treaty of 1842 partially delineated the northeastern U.S.-Canada border, but left the border of the Oregon Territory unsettled.

By 1843, increased American immigration on the Oregon Trail to the Territory made the border issue a burning one in Congress, where jingoists raised the slogan of “54 degrees 40 minutes or fight.” President James Polk, a supporter of Manifest Destiny with an eye also on the Mexican Southwest and California, was eager to settle the boundary of the Oregon Territory and proposed a settlement on the 49 degree line to Great Britain. British Minister to Washington, Richard Pakenham, and Secretary of State James Buchanan, supported and encouraged by British Foreign Secretary Lord Aberdeen and Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, worked out a compromise. With some minor modifications, which reserved the whole of Vancouver Island to Canada, Great Britain agreed to Polk’s suggestion. The Senate ratified the treaty by a vote of 41-14 on June 18, 1846. A later controversy over the precise boundaries in the Juan de Fuca Strait was resolved by international arbitration in favor of the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
There are international laws in place for underwater archaeological sites, but each country makes its own laws about land-based
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The given assertion would be categorized as true as it asserts an appropriate claim. The international laws have been created with an aim to claim the rights of different nations over underwater archaeological sites. However, each country is required to pass separate laws for claiming rights over its land-based archaeological sites in order to keep their possessions conserved and ensure the proper maintenance of their heritage and resources as these possessions are not only a landmark of their historical or pre-historical structures that enriches their national heritage and culture but also legitimate sites for resources. Therefore, the assertion is <u>true.</u>

7 0
4 years ago
Suppose you’re asked to evaluate an argumentative essay. What is the most important thing to look for when considering how well
AleksandrR [38]

Argumentative essay is a form of essay that provides facts over a point of dispute and argument and the supporting evidence for the facts and statement to claim their statement as correct.

The argumentative essay needs proper research and analysis of facts which are relevant and supports the statement of claim.

<h3>Elements of an Argumentative Essay </h3>

  • The essay must pitch a claim in the beginning and the claim should be clear and free from ambiguity.

  • The statement must have the facts and evidences obtained through proper research which supports the claim.

  • There must be a conclusion stating all the points of claim made in the essay with a closing statement.

<h3>Evaluation </h3>

  • The most important thing while evaluating an argumentative essay is that whether the supporting facts and evidence to the claims are from reliable sources and are genuine.

  • The facts and evidences are relevant and proves the statement as correct.

Therefore, the most important thing to look for when considering how well an author’s reasons support his or her claim is the reliability , relevance and originality of supporting facts.

Learn more about argumentative essay here:

brainly.com/question/7869273.

7 0
3 years ago
Beverly wants to take a cruise with her children. She selects one with a daycare that will ensure her children are well cared fo
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

noncompensatory

Explanation:

Beverly wants to take a cruise with her children. She selects one with a daycare that will ensure her children are well cared for, even though the onboard activities for adults on that cruise are less exciting than on other cruises. Beverly used a noncompensatory decision rule.

5 0
3 years ago
Most ethical theories agree on a large number of moral guidelines. For example, it is nearly universally held that it is wrong t
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

This is a philosophical approach, it must be taken into account that in ethical theory there is a large number of moral coincidences, such as: it is wrong to steal and its universality, in ethical theories. But there are also many differences between ethical theories, one very important and which divides them into two types, are the Materialist ethical theories and those that are not. Materialistic ethical theories are those that in general tell us what we must do to achieve good and to be good, that is, they are content ethics pursues a series of ethical norms about what we must do, they condition the rules or norms to persecuted objects.

In the ethical theories indicated there are differences, those of materialistic tendencies: first: the tendency of divine command very similar to the naturalistic theory of Saint Thomas, which defends the good with the approach to a supreme God and follows the law of divine origin . Second: DJMill's utilitarianism good is the pleasure or absence of pain and is achieved through pleasure actions. Now it is pointed out that Kantism (non-materialist) corresponds to being a formal ethic whose author was Kant, defends good with the only morally good, a good intention and seeks to achieve good in the imperative, categorical, acts in a way that he can wish without contradiction , points out that the maxim is taken as a universal law. Kantina's law is called formal and comes before material ethics.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an example of a behavior goal?
    14·1 answer
  • In movies that focus on war, soldiers who have returned from the frontlines often struggle with overwhelming anxiety, nervousnes
    8·1 answer
  • What does Neolithic age mean
    12·1 answer
  • Holding the belief that one does not notice racial differences, and that discussing race only perpetuates racism, would be consi
    5·1 answer
  • I need this answer really fast please will mark brainlies​
    8·1 answer
  • Charles Darwin suggested that, rather than being superior to the rest of the animal kingdom, human beings are simply one part of
    9·1 answer
  • If government spending increases in China, what will the effect on their GDP be?
    10·1 answer
  • Daniel goleman felt emotional intelligence was a combination of which three factors?
    8·1 answer
  • A researcher that finds considering a drug as an interruption or disorder of physiological functions as most useful for understa
    10·1 answer
  • What amendment did Gitlow v. New York violate?.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!