Answer:
Masculine
Explanation:
Under communication skills, there are different type of communication styles that has a bearing on the individual gender or physical characteristics who is communicating. Within cultural institutions, there are different communication-styles between genders exist due to disagreements in the way information is conveyed and how it is received by the gender involved. It is a common knowledge that male adopt a masculine communication style by displaying certain competitive traits, are more authoritative, more mission focused, dominance and are focus more on performance, while female communication styles have a tendency to be more circular focused, more likely to think or react to situations based on emotions.
Therefore based on different communication styles found in males and females, the scenario where Thomas suggests a video-game contest to his sister and She says, "Bring it on, I'm gonna whoop you." shows a predominant trait associated with a male under communication skill by displaying certain competitive traits, a more authoritative, sort of egocentric dominance. Thomas sister communication style in this incident is Masculine communication style
The Triple Alliance, also known as the Central Powers, consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. The other choices are incorrect and can be neglected. I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.
Answer:
c.No one else in the department had overtime hours but Harkanell.
Explanation:
Jerry Harkanell as an administrative staff means that his incharge of the clerical duties of the company which included the personnel informations regarding to no of hours worked, overtimes and leave day offered to some staff.
<em>One of the major red flag that made somone to become suspicious is on the issue of overtime. How is it possible that, it was only him that had overtime hours in the whole of the company knowing fully well that his job might not necessarly need and overtime.</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
Full question
Blow up." Jeanie is hauling gas in the back of her pick-up truck for her personal watercraft. She is planning a lake party and thinks she will need a lot of it. On the way home, Jeanie stops at the automatic teller machine at her bank and exits her car. Holly pulls behind her and negligently rear-ends Jeanie's pick-up. The truck explodes and results in the bank building burning to the ground. The bank sues Holly for negligence claiming that Holly should have to pay for the entire bank building. The bank claimed that it should be able to recover under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine.
A. The bank is correct because under that doctrine defendants are liable for any harm caused.
B. The bank is correct only if Holly has sufficient insurance to cover the bank burning.
C. The bank is correct only if it can be established that Holly was a repeat driving offender.
D. The bank is incorrect because the issue here is causation, not whether there was a lack of due care.
E. The bank is incorrect because res ipsa loquitur is a defense.
The bank is incorrect because the issue here is causation, not whether there was a lack of due care. The bank should be more concerned about what caused the explosion which really had nothing to do with Holly but why did the pick-up truck explode. How does Holly parking her car at rear-ends of Jeanie's pick up cause an explosion due to negligence. What is the prove
The common law of negligence, the res ipsa loquitur doctrine states that a breach of a party's duty of care may be inferred from the events that occurred. In other words, the negligence is so noticeable that you can tell that someone had a negligent hand in what happened.
