Which of the following is a key similarity between the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

History

2 answers:

zloy xaker [14]3 years ago

8 0

I believe your answer is C. Both acknowledged the right of territories to choose how to enter the Union.

I hoped this helped! Please rate, thank, and pick the Brainliest answer (not necessarily mine!). Thanks, it really helps! :)

Sphinxa [80]3 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is C. Both acknowledged the right of territories to choose how to enter the Union.

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1850 was a set of bills that had the purpose to end with the confrontation between different states that had acquired territories during the Mexican-American War, which was a territory conflict between 1846 and 1848. In this way, the Compromise of 1850 regulated the conditions of rights for the new territories to be part of the Union or the rest of the U.S. states, this included establishing the boundaries in New Mexico and letting some territories decide democratically if they agreed with slavery or not. On the other hand, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act passed on 1854 with the purpose of creating the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and allow the territories to decide democratically on slavery before entering the Union again, which means this act also recognized the right of the territories to decide how to enter the Union especially in terms of slavery. Considering this, it can be concluded a key similarity between the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska was that "both acknowledged the right of territories to choose how to enter the Union".

You might be interested in

How did baron de montesquieu and john locke influence the founding fathers

White raven [17]

At the time period, the founding fathers of the United States were heavily influenced by the philosophies of Montesquieu and John Locke. Montesquieu proposed a system of checks and balances by which one aspect of government would not and frankly, could not, possess too much power. The founding fathers accepted this idea thoroughly, as is evidenced by our current governmental system and the three branches. The Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches are all designed so that one branch will never exceed the other branches, Montesquieu influenced Benjamin Franklin in particular as he traveled to France frequently. Moreover, John Locke proposed the social contract. Essentially, the social contract states that a government must secure the rights of its citizens. In the event that it fails to do so, the citizens then have the right to rebel and overthrow such a government. The natural rights which he spoke of referred to a citizens right to life, liberty, and property. The founding fathers took his philosophy to heart, especially Thomas Jefferson. He made a slight variation though on Locke's natural rights, writing instead that citizens have the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

8 0

3 years ago

For how many years did the Etruscans control Rome? a. 59 years c. 141 years b. 163 years d. 202 years

zhannawk [14.2K]

The correct answer is C. 141 years.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What does adam smith say the purpose of the mercantile system is?

CaHeK987 [17]

Answer: Adam Smith coined the term “mercantile system” to describe the system of political economy that sought to enrich the country by restraining imports and encouraging exports. This system dominated Western European economic thought and policies from the sixteenth to the late eighteenth centuries.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Why did the poet Ralph Waldo Emerson call the first bullet fired in Lexington "the shot heard round the world"?

polet [3.4K]

Answer:

It started a revolution that showed the world that it was possible to overthrow an empire. It was the beginning of a push for democracy all over the world.

4 0

3 years ago

From the Iliad what does the interaction between Alexandria and hector reveal

laiz [17]

Lliad is the Greek name for the city of Troy.

This work, which integrates the western canon as much as The Odyssey, inspired several writers of the classical period and its presence was mandatory in the basic educational curriculum of Greece and, later, also of ancient Rome.

The Iliad addresses an episode of the War known as the Achilles' Wrath, referring only to some myths and events connected with the story of Troy, already incorporated into the knowledge of the Greeks. The reader, therefore, must have some command over the Trojan War to better understand this poem. It was triggered by the kidnapping of Helena, consort of Menelaus, king of Sparta, by Paris, son of the Trojan king, Priam.

The battles are commanded by Agamemnon, sovereign of Mycenae, brother of the outraged king. The Greeks advance against Troy and besiege the city, demanding the return of Helena. War, however, is just the scenario chosen to portray an even more painful and serious confrontation, which unfolds in the human soul, here represented by Achilles' troubled passions.

The Greek hero faces Agamemnon because of a Trojan slave, who was part of the spoils of war. In the division of these goods, the handmaid falls to Achilles, but the king takes her for himself. This episode provokes the wrath of Achilles, who refuses to fight. This decision weakens the Greek army and the Trojans gain an advantage. The hero's best friend, Pároclo, decides to remain in charge of a detachment, but is killed by Hector, the leader of the opponents.

Unhappy and overwhelmed by the fury, Achilles returns to war, eliminates Hector, and then, moved by compassion, returns the body to the father of the Trojan hero so that he can be buried. The famous event known as ‘Trojan Horse’ is also represented in the Iliad, culminating in the destruction of the city of Priam. Homer brilliantly deals with human contradictions, the terrible decisions made at the peak, freedom of choice, the interventions of the gods and the results of his orientations. The real war, here, has as its stage the intimate sphere of Man.

8 0

3 years ago