Answer:
Cook Islands I think?
Explanation:
sorry if thats wrong but I'm pretty sure thats it. :)
Answer:
Explanation:
To begin the essay, Thomas Paine gives a "pep-talk" to his fellow Americans that they shouldn't give up their cause of eradicating living under British rule during the "trying times" he alludes to. Ideas he uses to persuade his audience to revolt are that the British King is a tyrant and they can overcome their challenges no matter what they cost because the reward will be the greatest. He believed that the people where fighting in a war that will go down as historical (which it did). He believes that time was the most important part of their fight against the British. He believed there was hope of winning if American forces planned well and utilized their resources efficiently. By adding that Britian will try to oppress the peoples religious freedom was probably what got the most emotion out of the people because religion was so important to them, saying to subdue was a power that belongs "only to God."
He continues with events like "When William the Conqueror subdued England he gave them law at the point of the sword; and until we consent that the seat of government in America, be legally and authoritatively occupied, we shall be in danger of having it filled by some fortunate ruffian,.." The purpose of the annecdotal was to show that if this continues they will lose their freedom to tyrants (the British). He also alludes to past years under British rule saying "I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the house?" In this anecdotal appeal; he refers to events that have occurred in the recent past to appeal to his readers' emotions and remind them of how they have been negatively affected by the British government.
A. The embrace of machismo by mainstream society.
For political leanings I'll use the terms "liberal" and "conservative," rather than specific political parties. The justice who was seen as a centrist was Anthony Kennedy, who retired in 2018. So now all nine justices on the Supreme Court tend to be on either a liberal or conservative side of the political spectrum.
<h2>
LIBERAL JUSTICES</h2>
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice since 1993
- Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice since 1994
- Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice since 2009
- Elena Kagan, Associate Justice since 2010
<h2>
CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES</h2>
- Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice since 1991
- John Roberts, Chief Justice since 2005
- Samuel Alito, Associate Justice since 2006
- Neil Gorsuch, Associate Justice since 2017
- Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice since 2018
Highly disciplined janissaries if i’m not mistaken
i really hope i could help! good luck :)
