Which BEST explains how the population of a landlocked country might be affected by the country’s position?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is The lack of a seaport to trade goods might put the people at an economic disadvantage

Landlocked, inland or inland countries

Thus are known in the 'concert of nations' the 44 countries that have no outlet to the sea. In common, besides geography, poverty, the difficulty of doing trade, expanding its presence in the world, winning markets, etc. In Europe, only five of these countries have managed to get rid of poverty, but three of them have had to take serious risks in their banking systems so that, like the oceans, they attract wealth. We speak of Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Luxembourg. The other two European countries are Austria and San Marino. Africa contributes 16 more; Asia, ten; and South America, two more, Bolivia and Paraguay.

You might be interested in

Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition

ratelena [41]

I believe the answer is: Achieved status

Achieved status refers to a concept of social position which given to a certain individual due to the talents or personal efforts that the individual have. Examples of achieved status are : world tennis champion, world chess grandmaster, etc.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did the colony of India break up after independence? Summarized, please.

3241004551 [841]

Answer:

World War II profoundly affected the pioneer powers since it totally decimated their economies. Despite the fact that Hitler carried out wrongdoings against humankind, I give him credit—and not Gandhi—for India's freedom following World War II

4 0

3 years ago

When a client calls a "dog" a "bog", this is an example of ____?

Lilit [14]

Literal or phonemic paraphasias

3 0

3 years ago

Asch demonstrated that group unanimity exerted an influence on conformity, above group size alone. question 1 options: true.

Lorico [155]

The statement is TRUE.

In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to measure the dynamics of group-thinking. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity.

Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that increasing group size by up to three times, raised the conformity levels to 32%. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.

This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.

Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

What was the military consequence of the lack of unity among Greek city-states?

elena55 [62]

the armies couldn't be unified to stop an enemy from attakingand made them seem weaker and easier to invade

5 0

2 years ago