1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
3 years ago
6

Which statement most accurately describes the economic impact of sharecropping?

History
2 answers:
vredina [299]3 years ago
3 0
Whats the answer
Really need help
Sophie [7]3 years ago
3 0

I think it might be D.

You might be interested in
In what way was colonial reaction to the stamp act, the townshend acts, and the tea act similar? the colonists no longer bought
ANEK [815]
I would say B but A also looks like it could be an answer. it's not D for sure and they didn't protest each one by throwing tea in the harbor.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
'अ' गट
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:                                                                                                                  'अ' गट

ब' गट

(अ) सेक्युलस

(१) सम्राट अलेक्झांडर

(२) मेगॅस्थिनिस

(३) सम्राट अशोक

निकेटरचा राजदूत

(ब) ग्रीकचा सम्राट

(क) रोमचा सम्राट

(ड) मगधचा सम्राट​

Explanation:

ग्रीकचा

3 0
3 years ago
How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
miss Akunina [59]

When Europeans first touched the shores of the Americas, Old World crops such as wheat, barley, rice, and turnips had not traveled west across the Atlantic, and New World crops such as maize, white potatoes, sweet potatoes, and manioc had not traveled east to Europe. In the Americas, there were no horses, cattle, sheep, or goats, all animals of Old World origin. Except for the llama, alpaca, dog, a few fowl, and guinea pig, the New World had no equivalents to the domesticated animals associated with the Old World, nor did it have the pathogens associated with the Old World’s dense populations of humans and such associated creatures as chickens, cattle, black rats, and Aedes egypti mosquitoes. Among these germs were those that carried smallpox, measles, chickenpox, influenza, malaria, and yellow fever.

The Columbian exchange of crops affected both the Old World and the New. Amerindian crops that have crossed oceans—for example, maize to China and the white potato to Ireland—have been stimulants to population growth in the Old World. The latter’s crops and livestock have had much the same effect in the Americas—for example, wheat in Kansas and the Pampa, and beef cattle in Texas and Brazil. The full story of the exchange is many volumes long, so for the sake of brevity and clarity let us focus on a specific region, the eastern third of the United States of America.

As might be expected, the Europeans who settled on the east coast of the United States cultivated crops like wheat and apples, which they had brought with them. European weeds, which the colonists did not cultivate and, in fact, preferred to uproot, also fared well in the New World. John Josselyn, an Englishman and amateur naturalist who visited New England twice in the seventeenth century, left us a list, “Of Such Plants as Have Sprung Up since the English Planted and Kept Cattle in New England,” which included couch grass, dandelion, shepherd’s purse, groundsel, sow thistle, and chickweeds. One of these, a plantain (Plantago major), was named “Englishman’s Foot” by the Amerindians of New England and Virginia who believed that it would grow only where the English “have trodden, and was never known before the English came into this country.” Thus, as they intentionally sowed Old World crop seeds, the European settlers were unintentionally contaminating American fields with weed seed. More importantly, they were stripping and burning forests, exposing the native minor flora to direct sunlight and to the hooves and teeth of Old World livestock. The native flora could not tolerate the stress. The imported weeds could, because they had lived with large numbers of grazing animals for thousands of years.

Cattle and horses were brought ashore in the early 1600s and found hospitable climate and terrain in North America. Horses arrived in Virginia as early as 1620 and in Massachusetts in 1629. Many wandered free with little more evidence of their connection to humanity than collars with a hook at the bottom to catch on fences as they tried to leap over them to get at crops. Fences were not for keeping livestock in, but for keeping livestock out.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If it were not for this guy, teenagers would be unable to talk on the phone.
galben [10]

Answer:

Alexander Graham Bell.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WHY DID COMMUNISM HAVE SUCH A STRONG EFFECT ON AMERICA AFTER WWI?
blondinia [14]

Answer:

It is because of the USSR and them taking over lots of country's and for example the Vietnam war and the Korean war. In both wars the communist's parties were supplied by the USSR. Another thing is that both country's kept on feeling threatened by each other.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Francis Bacon ,Galileo and Isaac Newton promoted the idea that knowledge should be based on
    13·1 answer
  • Do militants help or hinder the progress of a social movement?
    11·1 answer
  • According to Hughes, how did most Negroes of the time feel about whites coming to Harlem? a. resentful c. pleased b. proud d. de
    7·2 answers
  • What was the main reason of rivarly amongg the trading companies.
    13·1 answer
  • 24) What purpose do 3rd parties play in presidential elections?
    13·2 answers
  • What nationality were the Boers? A. Portuguese B. English C. French D. Dutch
    9·2 answers
  • When did vaccines become mandatory in the us?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the industrial revolution
    8·1 answer
  • Along which borders did the trench warfare stretch
    7·1 answer
  • What was the risk situation in which sir douglas mawson was?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!