I'd say this means he wants forgiveness or reconciliation :)
Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
False, because sometimes you already know the plot.
Yet it was never enough for her.
Answer:
•The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.
Explanation:
Without transitions the argument will be unorganized. The reader will need to know how to follow along in a argument.
<3
