Answer:
The correct answer is C. buying up small railroad companies to drive up his business
Explanation:
According to history, Jay Gould between 1836-1892 of his lifetime was a railroad mogul in the United States predominantly in New York City. He was also a financier. Jay Gould's interest in the railroad industry grew beyond measures as he started with a move to invest in small railroads after much deliberation in 1859. He was involved in so many railroad projects that led him into holding high positions in the industry and by 1867, he was made director of "Erie Railroad".
To grow his business and fully own the railroad industry, Jay Gould started some fraudulent dealings in his stocks and paying bribes to some bodies in government. He properly invested in "Union Pacific Railroad" stocks and soon gained maximum control.
The answer is option D(multiple perspectives)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems that your question is missing one option, and it happens to be the correct one. It's option E).
So the correct answer is option E) breakup tribal landholdings.
From the 1880s to the New Deal, the dominant United States government policy toward American Indians was to break up tribal landholdings.
One of the best examples was the Indian Removal Act. Andrew Jackson encouraged westward expansion and settlement by supporting the Indian Removal Act.
On May 28, 1830, United States President Andrew Jackson signed the famous Indian Removal Act that supported the westward expansion and invited many Americans to settle territories in the west. These were territories west of the Mississippi, and the President could grant lands in exchange for Native American Indian tribes' lands that already existed within the known US territory.
So this act gave powers to the US President to negotiate the removal of the Native Indians to other territories. The President wanted to support white settling to farm the lands and make them productive.
The articles weakness was that they gave the federal government so little power that it couldn't keep the country united. The articles were abandoned for the constitution. The articles confederation did not give the federal government the power to tax. The articles of confederation did not have an executive branch in other words no president. The articles of confederation did not have a judicial branch to resolve disputes and set policy. It was very difficult to pass laws under the Articles of Confederation 9/13 of the states had to agree and almost impossible to revise the Articles the need every state to agree in order to make a change.
