The second one is the true statement
The <em><u>correct answers</u></em> are:
60 pounds of onion rings and 60 hamburgers.
Explanation:
Jack serves a half pound of onion rings with every burger. He serves 120 bacon cheeseburgers. To find the number of pounds of onion rings, we multiply 1/2 pound by 120 burgers:
1/2(120) = 1/2(120/1) = (1*120)/(2*1) = 120/2 = 60 pounds of onion rings.
There were 8 hamburgers served out of the first 40 orders. If this rate continues, then to find the number of hamburgers out of 300 orders, we multiply 8/40 by 300:
8/40(300) = 8/40(300/1) = (8*300)/(40*1) = 2400/40 = 60
There would be 60 hamburgers.
PLEASE HELP! In a word processing document or on a separate piece of paper, use the guide to construct a two column proof proving that triangle RST is congruent to triangle RSQ given that RS ⊥ ST, RS ⊥ SQ, and ∠STR ≅ ∠SQR. Submit the entire proof to your instructor.
Given:
RS ⊥ ST
RS ⊥ SQ
∠STR ≅ ∠SQR
Prove:
△RST ≅ △RSQ
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose at t = 0 the person is 1m above the ground and going up
Knowing that the wheel completes 1 revolution every 20s and 1 revolution = 2π rad in angle, we can calculate the angular speed
2π / 20 = 0.1π rad/s
The height above ground would be the sum of the vertical distance from the ground to the bottom of the wheel and the vertical distance from the bottom of the wheel to the person, which is the wheel radius subtracted by the vertical distance of the person to the center of the wheel.
(1)
where 
is vertical distance from the ground to the bottom of the wheel, 
is the vertical distance from the bottom of the wheel to the person, R = 10 is the wheel radius, 
is the vertical distance of the person to the center of the wheel.
So solve for in term of t, we just need to find the cosine of angle θ it has swept after time t and multiply it with R
Note that is negative when angle θ gets between π/2 (90 degrees) and 3π/2 (270 degrees) but that is expected since it would mean adding the vertical distance to the wheel radius.
Therefore, if we plug this into equation (1) then
What's the smallest six-digit whole number possible?
It is 100000
try counting, six digits, right? if you even take 1 off from it, it's no longer six digits, so it is the smallest six-digit whole number possible.
what's the greatest 4-digit number?
It should be 9999
try adding 1 to it, it becomes five-digit number.
So, 9999 is the greatest 4-digit whole number possible.
To get a difference, subtraction.
100000 - 9999 = 90001
Just as a tip, for six digit number, 000000 does not work, as it is same as 0
