Sorry bruh, don't know what your saying...
Answer:
1. If it were blm protesters, there would've been shoootings, deaths, tear gas, police officers punching and kicking protesters because the way America views and treats black people, minorities, and poc. They are treated as such that their life doesn't matter and white people are superior and more important.
2. The impact of yesterday's event at the capital proves that white privilge is real. They practically walked into the capital. The difference between that and blm protests is blm supporters are fighting for racial injustice and the trump supporters who raided and destroyed the capital are throwing tantrums cause trump lost. Especially the fact that the president of the US ENCOURAGED them to destroy and raid the capital. And many important people were inside and could've been killed like Mike Pence for instance. He put his on VP in danger. And the trump supporters at the capital were breaking the law by breaking in, smashing desks, stealing mail (which is fraud btw), and be all kinds of violent for what? because trump lost. And they only got treated a fraction of what blm supporters would've been treated
3. No i completely disagree with the methods of the "protesters" at the capital. They werent even protesters. They were criminals and rioters. Breaking the law. There are many other ways they could've done it. They could've simply had a peaceful protest like many BLM supporters did.
Explanation:
They are being established to defray further expenses of defending, protecting and securing.
Two statements that showed how racial tensions increased between 1988 and 1992 include:
- The 1988 election ads used stereotypes to help elect Bush.
- A highly publicized police brutality incident resulted in no convictions.
<h3>How did racial tensions increase between 1988 and 1992?</h3>
The Willie Horton ads used by the Bush campaign took advantage of the fears that people had about Black people and crime.
The Rodney King arrest was a high profile case that saw him beaten by police men in a brutal manner and yet there were no convictions. This fuel riots.
Find out more on the Rodney King Riots at brainly.com/question/10135114.
Women had long been seen as stay at home mothers before World War Two and only that. The stereotypical, perfect American family had the father that brought home the bacon each day during the week and the mother who raised their children. The fact of the matter is, women always worked outside the house but it just wasn’t glorified as much. These women were usually in the lower class or the minority and many men did not have the best attitude toward them. A male could better suit their jobs, the men believed. During WWII all of this changed and a revolution in the work force was eventually seen. Numbers of women working outside the home rose exponentially and they thought they were there to stay. Women also played a large role in the military, which had never been seen before. Gender roles had changed in the modern world; women throughout the nation made a huge impact on the Second World War efforts.
Hope this helps!!
