1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xeze [42]
3 years ago
14

Name the representative of the Wampanoag who negotiated with the colonists.

History
1 answer:
JulijaS [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Wôpanâak

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The 1911 revolution in china ended the rule of the . 1. qing 2. song 3. mongols 4. ming
ludmilkaskok [199]
The 1911 revolution in China ended the rule of the Qing Dynasty. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "1". The Xinhai Revolution ended 2000 years of Imperial rule in China. I hope the answer has come to your help.
5 0
3 years ago
Question 2: What trials and tribulations does Nelson describe encountering.
mezya [45]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did include context or reference to know what you are talking about. You write the name "Nelson." Nelson who? In what context?  At what time? In what part of US history? Which events?

You need to include the proper contexts and references to better help you.

Trying to be of help we are going to assume that you are talking about George Nelson and his relationship to the fur trade in colonial American times. If that is teh case, then we can comment on the following.

George Nelson was born in Quebec, in 1798 after his parents relocated during the American Revolutionary War.

The trials and tribulations that Nelson describes were the ones presented in the fur trade when he worked for the "XY Company" in 1802. He was in charge of a fur trade outpost in the Northern Michigan Territory(modern-day Wisconsin). He was very young, he was 16 years old, and his inexperience created many conflicts buy his intelligence was an asset for the company.

Later in his life, we worked for the North West Company and the Hudson Bay Company. During his work life as a clerk in these companies, he kept the journals of the daily events. Today, the importance of these documents is that the journals describe the life and trade during those interesting times in North America.

6 0
2 years ago
Which state governor proposed a more radical
hoa [83]

Answer:

the answer is huey long

7 0
3 years ago
Who was 16 president of United States?
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln

6 0
3 years ago
Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom
notka56 [123]

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the living conditions in Manchester during the Industrial revolution​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes what World War 2 internees faces when they returned home?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was iron ore considered valuable? Iron Ore is crucial for the manufacture of some of the most important pieces of modern and
    11·1 answer
  • Directions: after declaring independence from great britain, america's first government was established by the articles of confe
    7·1 answer
  • Based on Lincoln's quote, which statement best explains American democracy?
    7·2 answers
  • How was the life of an aristocrat different from that of a wealthy noble from the feudal system?A.
    7·2 answers
  • What describes the Pilgrims' first winter at Plymouth?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the age of discovery lead to globalization
    14·1 answer
  • How does an author build an effective argument?
    8·1 answer
  • Whats the answer.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!