Answer:
A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.
Explanation:
Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."
This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)
Answer:
1. Columbus returns from first voyage to America
2. England issues charter for Virginia
3. Charles Il passes Navigation Acts
4. James II forms Dominion of New England
5. French and Indian War begins
Answer:
There are no limitations on “human rights” because they do not exist in the natural world. If there were such things as “natural rights” there would be no need to define and enforce them since, being part of the natural world, they would require no human intervention.
Explanation:
I searched your question on the internet and the first thing I saw was that^^
Social media has connected people all across the world. It is considered a gift, because news and rather interesting viral videos, are scattered around the world in the matter of seconds. With social media, news have more of an elaborate way of spreading
