Answer: True
Explanation: Don't know how to explain this, but its true I think.
The short answer is "yes". At the time of colonization there was a
relatively endless number of jobs that needed to be completed.
Immigration simply could not keep up.
Answer:
Latin America has been a region exploited by national as well as foreign capital for decades. During the nineteenth century countries such as Germany, Portugal, Spain and England were the ones in charge of exploiting the natural resources of the region for decades, colonizing countries and abusing the Latin American working class. The United States arrived in another phase of history, after the aforementioned countries, but today it has already become the world power that keeps Latin America under the yoke of US imperialism.
In order for the United States to make its way into the other imperialist countries, it was necessary to establish a policy that was defended by the successive American governments, which was known as the Monroe Doctrine, which in Trotsky's words is understood as:
Explanation:
"The right of US imperialism to position itself dominant in Latin American countries, assuming the position of being its exclusive operator."
Answer:
On the most widely accepted account of civil disobedience, famously defended by John Rawls (1971), civil disobedience is a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies.
Explanation:
hope this helps. :)
The foreign policy of William Howard Taft was largely a continuation of Theodore Roosevelt's, particularly as it related to Latin America. Both presidents advocated an active, even interventionist foreign policy, an approach often called "big stick" diplomacy under Roosevelt.