All categories

3 years ago

Evaluate the impact/effects of fraud and corruption on the counrty

2 answers:

lisabon 2012 [21]3 years ago

8 0

Corruption has a bad influence on the market, leads to an inefficient allocation of resources and highlights social inequality. The existence of corruption in a country affects the diversion of existing investors, as well as the failure of new ones. Because of this, unemployment rises, the state collects less taxes, the budget is smaller, and thus less money for public spending and procurement, as well as for government programs, employment, education, social programs. This also affects the business atmosphere and the market, because some companies come to the tender through corruption, other companies that do not do so, make less profits, so they dismiss workers and even leave the state and move their plants due to irregular market conditions.

pishuonlain [190]3 years ago

4 0

The corruption severely affects the poor; it also damages programs and policies that aim to decrease the poverty. Corruption undermines the development of country by distorting the “rule of law” and weakening the “institutional foundation” upon which “economic growth” depends.

Further Explanation:

Corruption threatens ethical values, sustainable economic development, and justice. Corruption affects every person in the society. It endangers the ‘rule of law’ and destabilizes the society. It undermines the ‘institutions’ and ‘values’ of our democracy. Public resources and public policies are largely “beneficial” to poor people; it is poor people who suffer the negative and harmful effects of “corruption” more grievously.

To be “dependent” on the “government” for healthcare, security, welfare, and housing, makes the poor people vulnerable to “corruption” since it stalls “service delivery”. Poor building quality, delays in infrastructure and layers of “additional costs” are all the results or consequences of corruption

Learn More:

1. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

brainly.com/question/1804110

2. How did California differ from the united states in terms of interactions of whites and natives

brainly.com/question/7248802

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Corruption

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords:

corruption, policies, development, poverty, law, economic growth, ethical values, security

You might be interested in

What is the Marines slogan?

cricket20 [7]

"The few. The Proud. The Marines."

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A reporter meets a fire truck at a huge blaze engulfing a large house. The reporter asks the firefighters if she can follow them

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

B). Able to successfully sue the reporter for intrusion if the homeowner did not give the reporter permission to be in the house.

Explanation:

As per the given description, the homeowner would probably be 'able to sue the reporter successfully for intruding if the homeowner himself didn't allow the reporter to be present in the house' as the reporter entered the house without the permission of the home's owner but rather entered with the permission of the firefighters. Since the house belongs to the owner he/she possess the legal rights to sue any person for intrusion who has engulfed his/her house without prior permission. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

3 0

3 years ago

ow-income nations have a dilemma as to whether to fix or float. There are many factors that affect their decisions and how effec

Tasya [4]

Answer:

PART A

(1) The lack of the needed funds

(2) The lack of the needed expertise

(3) Corruption and misappropriation of funds

(4) lack of political will

PART B

(1) The availability of the needed expertise

(2) The availability of funds

(3) The political will

Explanation: Low-income countries are countries whose income levels are low making them not to be able to meet with the demand of its citizens. Several factors mitigate or affect their decisions and how effectively they can manage Financial situations they include

(1) The lack of the needed funds

(2) The lack of the needed expertise

(3) High rate of corruption and funds misappropriation

(4) The lack of the political will needed to handle such a situation.

The following are factors that play into the Success of policy

(1) The availability of the needed funds

(2) The availability of the needed expertise

(3) The political will.

All these factors are vital to o the success of a policy especially as it relates to Government.

8 0

3 years ago

federal system maintains close relationship between the government and the people justify the statement in paragraph.

jonny [76]

Answer:

federal system maintains close relationship between the government and the people because Federalism can eliminate the problems of the system, and in a federal system power is shared between the central government and state government. Similarly, people have the rights to choose the state and central government and they can vote for their candidates to run the governance.

3 0

3 years ago

Why are civil rights guaranteed in constitution ?

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

Civil liberties are protections against government actions. For example, the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to practice whatever religion they please. Government, then, cannot interfere in an individual's freedom of worship.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago