Why was the south destroyed 1865-1877

1 answer:

8 0

The years 1865-1877 was the so-called Reconstruction Era. The Reason for this reconstruction was the devastation of the country during the Civil War.

Additionally, the South had to be transformed from the point of view of the North: with slavery abolished, many social changes had to be introduced - this was the other reason for Reconstruction.

You might be interested in

Before the ancient civilizations developed sometime around 3500 BCE, humans in those regions had lived as hunter/gatherer people

kirill [66]

Answer:

Becuase he did not want to scare the people while he was oing his job

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

what are some possible questions scientists may have had when they discovered these bones of an early hominid?

gogolik [260]

Answer:

What you doing

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

A tariff has the effect of granting ____ a larger share of the domestic market.

Katena32 [7]

It seems that you have missed the given options for this question, but anyway, the answer would be DOMESTIC PRODUCERS. A tariff has the effect of granting domestic producers <span>a larger share of the domestic market. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. </span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Economics is defined as a study of the

BARSIC [14]

You would best describe Economics as the study of how society allocates resources and good as well. This would be how resources are limited, and how they can keep up with the unlimited demands and wants of the resources.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A clinical psychologist wants to test a treatment to reduce the self-injury behavior of an autistic child. She faces an ethical

AfilCa [17]

Answer:

Case study

Explanation:

A case study is a kind of study used in social sciences in which the researcher observes an individual/group/event in a very in-depth manner. Case studies give a lot of information about the person or group who is being studied and let the researcher make causal inferences (because of the in-depth observation) and the researcher gets a better understanding of the situation.

In this question, the psychologist faces an ethical dilemma of needing to remove a potentially beneficial treatment. However, using a case study, she wouldn't need to do so because she could observe the autistic child in his environment without changing it, because the case study is an observing explanatory study. Therefore, the ethical dilemma would be eliminated and she could draw conclusions from the study.

5 0

3 years ago