The desert was harsh and hard to cross
Answer:
At present, when democracy is spoken of as a form of social organization, it is generally understood as the most fair for the majority, so that in practice it should be the most beneficial for a society, and in this way progress could be made. Towards a better state. But what happens in countries where there is no real democracy as it is in Cuba, China, as well as some Arab countries where the form of government is rather authoritarian? Probably in those nations the idea of how to achieve that "it is better for the people" is different from what is thought in most countries today, or in the case of ancient Greece where democracy was considered one of the worst systems of government. That is why, given that Chile is currently a democratic country, in theory, it is necessary to analyze the true strengths and weaknesses of this way of governing as well as consider the question of really being in a democratic society.
Comparative advantage is the lowest opportunity cost, absolute advantage is the best producer.
1. Roman women could hold office- False
2. Roman women could own property- True
3. Roman women could divorce their husbands- True
Explanation:
Roman women has less political and social status than their men. Roman women can not hold office. They can not occupy a higher position in office. Though who belong to elite society they some time hold a position in social hierarchy.
Roman women can bought property and could be its owner also. Roman women have the power to authorize her property in single handle. Roman women have the right to divorce her husband. If a couple is not happy in their marriage then the female partner can take the decision to be separated from her husband.
