Answer:
Deductive Reasoning
Explanation:
The given condition is an example of deductive reasoning. Two arguments are related that bring a valid conclusion given the conditions hold true to both.
Deductive Reasoning: Process of making logical arguments by facts and logic.
Deduction:
Condition 1--- Jason can run 100 meter in 15 seconds
Condition 2--- Sarah is faster at racing any distance
Conclusion--- Sarah can run 100 meter in less than 15 seconds
Reason: Since Sarah is faster than Jason in any race therefore she can win run faster than him at any given condition. Jason runs 100 meter in 15 seconds which means Sarah can run the same distance in less than 15 seconds as she is faster than him.
1778-1825) William McIntosh was a controversial chief of the Lower Creeks in early-nineteenth-century Georgia. His general support of the United States and its efforts to obtain cessions of Creek territory alienated him from many Creeks who opposed white encroachment on indianland.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The 14th Amendment guarantees Equal protection
.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The 14th Amendment addresses various matters regarding the citizenship and rights of the citizens. This amendment guaranteed that all individuals would be treated the same way without any sort of discrimination, and this shall be done regardless of the circumstances.
This ensures the protection of civil rights and allows a government to rule impartially without making any distinctions based on matters of irrelevance. When an individual feels that either the federal or the state government has violated this clause, he /she can file a lawsuit against the government for relief.
Answer:
Scientific jury selection.
Explanation:
This explained to be the use of social science techniques and expertise to choose favorable juries during a criminal or civil trial. Scientific jury selection is used during the jury selection phase of the trial when lawyers have the opportunity to question jurors and they and the judge choose which people will be on the jury. It almost always entails an expert's assistance in the attorney's use of peremptory challenges the right to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason during jury selection. The practice is currently confined to the American legal system.
